CO129-489 - Governor Sir Stubbs & Sir Clementi - 1925 [8-12] — Page 352

which was enced in the Reference

Thest No. 3/1923 dated the all Now,

1924,

J

reason

exception

Cap

wentigned in

Selo day.

advised that there is no

for admitting any special train to this procedure in the of Houghong,

cofecially

the Director of Col. Audit has had occasion in the fast to drow attention to the fact that the inclusion of expire. credits in the

accounts has had the effect of concealing considerable aunts, of unauthorised expre. in the account.

Colomjo

In this correction I would invite

your

орово

para. 5 of the

attention to fara.

refort of the Director of Col. Audit

بق

the Account for the year

ended

the Is Dec, 1922, or copy of which

was enced in the Duke

of

Devons lives

ded. No. 384 of the 18 Dec, 1923.

3.

with regard

to the question

(56001

marhandenes shich was

sed in

rating to the definition (11667) "["term "gross Seceipt" wind in panas. 2 and 3 letter of the 24th a hor? Him the Colmial Office Creasury.

of the recovery of Postal Transit Charges, which is dealt with in the fifth subsequent fares, of für RS Subho deep, I have to invite reference to

th

349

Lord Gere's desy. No. 116 of the

29 Afe, 1910, and to pection z of Order No. 1 of 1901, from

which it affears

to be

very

doubtful whether the treatment

of

ouch recoveries as

expire.

credits instead of including

them in the "gross receipts"

of the

Postal Deft. is in

accordance with the exis

autho

governing

existing

the calculation

of the Mil. Contribution, of

however,

revenne

Lartain items of

are to be exempted from

such assessment the correct

procedure to be followed is that which has already

bean